Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. But lately, 'Art' has emerged
as an alternative investment instrument, even as the status tag
continues to be attached to art and artifacts. Perhaps one of the main
causes for this increasing shift towards investments in art, are the
volatile stock markets and the low rates of returns on the traditional
means of investments.
However, as is always the case, can taxes
be far behind? The booming art market caught the Finance Minister's eye
a few years ago and loopholes were duly plugged, as Rahul Kapoor finds
out.
Rahul Kapoor an avid collector based in India, invested in
a painting of the famous painter M.F. Hussain. He intends to hold the
said investment for a period of five to ten years. However, as the
Government vide its Union Budget 2007, amended the Income Tax Act, 1961
(Act) to impose capital gains tax on sale of art work by a collector in
works of art. Now Rahul Kapoor is concerned regarding the tax
implications arising on sale of his art investment. Let us examine
these implications..
Rahul Kapoor, could before this amendment
contend that art work he owned constitutes personal effects like
wearing apparel (clothes) or furniture. On an occasional sale of an art
work he could argue that it was a capital receipt (and not income) and
therefore not subject to tax under the Act. However, as mentioned
above, now the sale of art works falls under the purview of Act as
'Income from capital gains'. The definition of capital assets inter
alia now includes personal effects such as drawings, paintings,
sculptures and any work of art.
Profit on sale of capital asset
is treated as capital gains. The capital gains could be segregated into
'short term capital gains' or 'long term capital gains' based upon the
period of holding of the capital asset. A capital asset shall be
treated as a 'short term capital asset' if it is held for a period of
not more than three years immediately preceding the date of its
transfer.
The gains arising on sale of such an asset will be
treated as 'short term capital gains'. However, if the capital asset is
held for more than three years, the same shall be treated as a 'long
term capital asset' and the gains arising on such a sale will be
classified as 'long term capital gains'.
For the purposes of
computing the gains arising on the sale of capital assets, the cost of
acquisition / improvement of the asset and any expenses incurred on
transfer of the capital asset are reduced from the full value of the
sale consideration received. However, if Rahul Kapoor acquires the art
work as a gift or through inheritance, the cost of acquisition of the
art work for him would be deemed to be the cost for which the previous
owner of the art work acquired it, as increased by the cost of any
improvement incurred or borne by the previous owner or by Rahul Kapoor
himself, as the case may be.
Now, if the painting sold by Rahul
Kapoor qualifies as a long term capital asset, he would be entitled to
claim a higher cost of purchasing / improving the capital asset by
indexing the original cost of acquisition / improvement. In such a
situation, the gains arising therefrom would be chargeable to tax at
the rate of twenty percent.
Where Rahul Kapoor earns gains from
transfer of the painting which qualifies to be a long term capital
asset, he would be exempt from payment of whole / part of taxes thereon
if the long term capital gains / net sale consideration is reinvested
by him in certain specified securities. If the painting sold by Rahul
Kapoor is a short term capital asset, the gains arising to him would be
chargeable to tax at the rate of thirty percent, assuming that Rahul
falls in the highest tax bracket.
Where the sale of painting is
made by Rahul Kapoor to the Government or a University or the National
Museum, National Art Gallery, National Archives or any such other
public museum or institution as may be notified by the Central
Government, the same shall not be regarded as a transfer of capital
asset and accordingly not be chargeable to capital gains tax.
Further,
if the gains arising to Rahul Kapoor are chargeable to tax in another
country, Rahul Kapoor shall also be entitled to claim a benefit of
taxes, if any paid in the other country in accordance with the Double
Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the other country.
What
about losses? True, a M.F. Hussain painting is unlikely to depreciate
in value. But assuming that a loss has been incurred on sale of such
painting, what then? In case of a long term loss on sale of the
painting, Rahul Kapoor shall be entitled to set off the same only
against long term capital gains earned by him on sale of other assets
during the same year.
However, if Mr Kapoor sells off the
painting before a period of three years and incurs any short term
capital losses, the same shall be entitled to be set off against any
capital gains (ie long term or short term) earned by him. If Mr Kapoor
does not earn any gains during the same year in which losses have been
incurred by him, he shall be entitled to carry forward the said losses
for a period of eight years and set- off the same against future gains
to be earned by him. In such a situation, long term capital losses
would be eligible to be set off only against long term capital gains
and short term capital losses would be eligible to be set off against
any capital gains.
Given that Rahul Kapoor is investing in a
painting of M.F. Hussain as a means of alternative investment, he could
also consider investing into units of unlisted art funds / schemes
launched by various financial institutions. Art funds typically operate
by pooling in money from select investors and use it to buy art objects
that have huge appreciation potential. Such an investment will enable
Rahul Kapoor to take advantage of the expertise of the fund manager as
well as assist him in minimizing his risk of directly investing in art.
The tax implications on Rahul Kapoor with regard to sale of units of an
unlisted art fund would be similar as indicated aforesaid for sale of
art.
(The authors are senior tax professionals, Ernst & Young)
Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people
- Currently 5/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5